History of Medicaid Expansion

Quick History Lesson of Medicaid Expansion in Idaho

In Idaho, the landscape of healthcare access underwent a significant shift in 2018 when voters, through a popular referendum, mandated the state's participation in Medicaid Expansion. This decision, backed by 61% of the electorate, propelled Idaho into a program that significantly broadened eligibility for medical coverage. While the bedrock of Medicaid originated in 1965, a component of President Lyndon Johnson's social welfare programs, the Expansion aspect stemmed from the 2010 Affordable Care Act.

Medicaid, historically a collaborative endeavor between state and federal entities, provides healthcare assistance to vulnerable populations, including low-income families, pregnant individuals, those with disabilities, and elderly citizens requiring long-term care. The funding structure traditionally involves a 70/30 split, with the federal government covering the larger portion. Medicaid Expansion, in contrast, extends coverage to individuals earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level, with the federal government shouldering 90% of the financial burden. This was supposed to help the working poor. 

Prior to the 2018 referendum, Idaho's legislative body had consistently opposed the implementation of Medicaid Expansion. However, the successful ballot initiative, spearheaded by advocacy groups, effectively bypassed legislative resistance. These groups emphasized the potential for cost-effective healthcare delivery to previously uninsured individuals. Contrary to initial projections, the program's fiscal impact has exceeded original estimates, surpassing $1 billion, a stark contrast to the initially proposed $400 million, and that number continues to rise.

Currently, Medicaid, inclusive of the Expansion, consumes a considerable portion of Idaho's state budget, exceeding one-third. Any proposals aimed at adjusting or curtailing these expenditures encounter strong opposition, often accompanied by assertions of dire consequences for beneficiaries. This resistance extends even to suggested modifications targeting able-bodied, working-age adults who gained coverage through the relatively recent Expansion. The dependency on these social programs has created a climate where any alteration is extremely difficult.

Option